Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Regular Normal Subgroups and Semidirect Products

Let G act transitively on Ω throughout. We shall be concerned with the case where G has a regular normal subgroup K, meaning that KG acts transitively on Ω and the stabilizer Kα is trivial for every α (this is the regular action, it's equivalent to the action on the cosets 1g).

Lemma If G acts transitively on Ω with regular normal subgroup K choose αΩ the action of Gα on K by conjugation is equivalent to its action on Ω with 1K corresponding to αΩ.
proof: Define θ:KΩ by kαk. This is a bijection since K is regular. We just need to show that the two actions are equivalent: (kθ)g=αkg=αgkg=αkg=kgθ.

If G is multiply transitive and has a regular normal subgroup K the subgroup Gα is transitive on Ω{α} and hence K#=K{1} as conjugation is an automorphism of a group, this means in particular that the group K ???? automorphisms ?????? ff

Lemma An automorphism preserves the order of a group element.
proof: Let θ:GG be an automorphism and g have order n, then (θg)i1 for any 0<i<n since if it did θ(gi)=1 implies that gi=1.

Proposition Let K be a group then
  1. If AutK acts transitively on K# then K is elementary abelian
  2. If AutK is 2-transitive on K# then either KCs2 or C3
  3. If AutK is 3-transitive on K# then KC22
  4. AutK is not 4-transitive.
 proof: (1) Since automorphisms preserve the order of elements all elements must have the same order, and that order must be a prime otherwise there would be elements with smaller order, by Cauchy's theorem we can say this is a p-group and so Z(K) is non-trivial. In fact we know Z(K)charG (because the center is preserved by conjugation) now any automorphism of K fixes a characteristic subgroup like Z(K) so for transitivity to be possible Z(K)=K. This implies K is abelian and therefore a direct product of cyclic groups, which we know must all be Cp!
(2) Since 2-transitivity implies primitivity of the action we define a relation on K# that is an AutK-congruence: kRk if k=k or k1=k. Clearly this is an equivalence relation preserved by the action hence by primitivity it must be the equality relation (implying k1=k so the group is Cs2) or the entire relation (implying every two non-identity elements are equal or inverse so the group will be C3).
(3) If the group is further 3-transitive, then it's impossible that it's C3: That's too small! Take some kK# and consider the stabilizer (AutK)k which is 2-transitive hence primitive so again let's define a congruence on it k1Rk2 if k2=k1 or k2=kk1 - meaning that k1,k2 "differ by k" - this can't be the equality relation since that would imply k=1 so it's the universal relation implying KC22.
(3)  This is impossible again because the group is too small.

Corollary Suppose G acts t-transitively on Ω with a regular normal subgroup K so |Ω|=|K| then
  1. If t=2 then KCsp
  2. If t=3 then KCs2 or C3
  3. If t=4 then KC22
  4. t<5
Proposition If (G,Ω) is a primitive permutation group such that some Gα is simple (therefore all Gα are simple) then either G is simple or has a regular normal subgroup.
proof: Suppose G is not simple, then there's a K such that 1KG. In that case KGαGα is simple so KGα=1 or KGα=Gα but K is transitive by a corollary on primitive permutation groups and Gα is a maximal subgroup by another corollary so we cannot have GαK (certainly Gα<K can't happen, and if G=Gα then \alpha gGα=αg so Gα=Gβ==G contradiction). Then KGα=1 so K is regular because it's a normal subgroup which we showed acts transitively and also it has the regular action because we saw that Kα=1.

Definition Let H,K be groups with a homomorphism θ:HAutK. For kK, hH write kh short for khθ. Then the semidirect product KH is defined as the group K×H with binary operation:
(k1,h1)(k2,h2)=(k1kh112,h1h2).
proof: prove this is a group

Define subgroups of the semidirect product ˜K={(k,1)} and ˜H={(1,h)} then ˜KKH, ˜HKH, ˜K˜H=1,,˜K˜H=KH and ˜KKH but we don't know that ˜HKH. This is an "external" construction of the semidirect product. We also have an internal one. An extension G of K by H is such that KG, G/KH i.e. the short exact sequence 1KGH1 in which case we write G=K.H, the . is "neutral" meaning that it doesn't really tell you how the group has been extended.

Definition if we have a s.e.s. like above with KG, KH=1 and KH=G we call G a split extension of K by H and write G=K:H.

Theorem If G is a split ext then define θ:HAutK by khθ=kh. Then GKH.

Corollary If G is transitive on Ω with a regular normal subgroup then G=K:Gα.

No comments:

Post a Comment